☒️

Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant β€” Safety Tracker

Europe's largest nuclear power plant was seized by Russian forces on March 4, 2022. The IAEA has maintained a permanent presence since September 2022, documenting ongoing safety violations. All 6 reactors are in cold shutdown. The risk of nuclear incident remains elevated.

6
VVER-1000 Reactors
5.7 GW
Pre-war capacity
Mar 4, 2022
Date of Russian seizure
7/7
IAEA safety pillars at risk

IAEA Seven Pillars of Nuclear Safety β€” Current Status

Physical integrity
Military occupation, shelling in vicinity
Compromised
Safety & security systems
Multiple power loss events, diesel dependency
At risk
Qualified staff
Staff under duress, reduced expertise
Compromised
External power supply
Repeated complete grid disconnection
Critical
Supply chain
Limited equipment access, Russian control
Degraded
Radiation monitoring
Limited IAEA access to all systems
Degraded
Off-site emergency response
Emergency plans broken by occupation/war
Non-functional

Safety Incident Timeline

Mar 4, 2022πŸ’₯Shelling
Critical

Russian forces attacked and seized the Zaporizhzhia NPP complex. Fire broke out in the training building during the assault. First time in history a nuclear plant was seized during active combat.

Mar–Aug 2022πŸ‘·Staffing
High

Russian military occupied the plant; Ukrainian staff remained working under duress. IAEA warned of "unprecedented" situation with staff under extreme stress and coercion.

Aug 5–6, 2022πŸ’₯Shelling
High

Heavy shelling near ZNPP damaged high-voltage power lines. Both sides accused each other. IAEA called for urgent access. UN Secretary-General called for demilitarized zone.

Sep 1, 2022πŸ”¬IAEA
High

First IAEA mission arrived at ZNPP. Director General Grossi led initial assessment. Team found evidence of military presence and damage. Permanent IAEA monitoring mission established.

Sep 11, 2022⚑Power Loss
Critical

Last external 750kV power line lost; ZNPP operating on single 330kV backup line β€” unprecedented INES safety concern. Plant can only maintain cooling via emergency diesels if external power fails completely.

Sep 25, 2022⚑Power Loss
Critical

ZNPP disconnected from Ukrainian grid entirely β€” lost all external power. Diesel generators activated. Plant fully in "cold shutdown." IAEA: one of seven pillars of nuclear safety now violated.

Nov 2022🌑️Cooling
High

IAEA warned about integrity of cooling ponds. Reports that Russian forces stored military equipment in turbine halls. Plant gradually moved all 6 reactors to cold shutdown.

Feb 2023⚑Power Loss
High

Repeated losses of external power β€” ZNPP relying on single backup 330kV line. Diesel fuel reserves critically low at multiple points. IAEA called situation "extremely precarious."

Mar–Jun 2023πŸ”¬IAEA
Medium

IAEA continued rotating presence. Permanent monitoring team rotated every ~2 months. Found no evidence of mines under reactors, contrary to some earlier reports.

Jun 6, 2023🌑️Cooling
High

Nova Kakhovka dam destroyed β€” ZNPP cooling ponds no longer replenishable from Kakhovka reservoir via canal. Ukraine and IAEA assessed backup cooling systems could maintain safety for months.

Jul–Sep 2023🌑️Cooling
Medium

Cooling pond water level monitored closely following Kakhovka dam breach. IAEA: pond has enough water for "months" without reservoir replenishment. Level tracking ongoing.

Oct 2023–2025πŸ’₯Shelling
Medium

Continued periodical shelling in vicinity of ZNPP. IAEA reiterated calls for nuclear safety zone. Russian forces maintained military presence at plant throughout this period.

2024–2026πŸ‘·Staffing
High

Staff numbers continued to decline. Many original Ukrainian specialists fled or were replaced by Russian personnel. IAEA noted persistent concerns about qualifications and psychological state of remaining workforce. As of early 2026, IAEA maintains rotating team of 2–5 inspectors on-site.

OngoingπŸ”¬IAEA
High

IAEA maintains permanent presence with 2–5 inspectors rotating. Seven nuclear safety pillars remain at risk. IAEA calls for nuclear safety zone and demilitarization of the plant.

Why ZNPP Matters

Largest in Europe

ZNPP has 6 Γ— 1,000 MW reactors β€” total capacity 5,700 MW. Pre-war it supplied ~20% of Ukraine's electricity.

Cooling Dependency

Reactors need continuous cooling even in shutdown. Loss of all external power + diesel failure could lead to fuel overheating within hours.

Chornobyl Comparison

ZNPP is 10Γ— the size of Chornobyl. A major accident could be catastrophic for Ukraine, Moldova, Romania, and beyond. Wind patterns determine fallout zones.

International Response

IAEA Director Grossi has visited ZNPP multiple times. UN Security Council has held emergency sessions. Russia and Ukraine both blame each other for safety violations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant a concern during the war?
ZNPP is Europe's largest nuclear plant (5.7 GW, 6 VVER-1000 reactors). Russian forces seized it March 4, 2022. The IAEA has documented all 7 nuclear safety pillars as compromised: reactor safety, cooling, external power, security, emergency response, radiation monitoring, and safeguards. Loss of external power β€” needed for cooling spent fuel β€” could cause a nuclear incident.
Could ZNPP cause an accident like Chernobyl?
The risk profile is different. ZNPP uses VVER-1000 reactors (not the RBMK type that failed at Chernobyl) with passive safety features. The primary concern is a spent fuel cooling failure β€” which could release significant radioactivity. The scenario would be less severe than Chernobyl but could contaminate southern Ukraine, Moldova, and parts of Romania.
Is the Zaporizhzhia plant still generating electricity?
No. All 6 reactors have been in cold shutdown since September 2022. The plant requires continuous external power and cooling water to keep spent fuel safe. It no longer produces electricity for Ukraine or Russia, but needs ongoing maintenance to prevent a nuclear incident.
What is the IAEA doing at Zaporizhzhia?
The IAEA has maintained a permanent monitoring mission (ISAMZ) at ZNPP since September 2022. Teams rotate regularly and document safety violations, external power disruptions, and access restrictions. The IAEA has published dozens of reports calling for a nuclear safety protection zone around the plant, which Russia has refused.
Has Zaporizhzhia come close to a nuclear incident?
Yes. The IAEA has documented multiple serious incidents: loss of all external power down to a single backup line, shelling near reactor buildings, mines on plant grounds, and restricted access for maintenance workers. IAEA Director General Grossi has stated the plant is operating by "a thread" of safety margins.